Plant Genetics

Genetic coding is ubiquitous to all life

Genetic coding is a universal feature of all life forms on Earth. Despite significant advancements in the biological sciences over the past two decades, there is still much to discover. The completion of the human genome project, alongside the sequencing of important agricultural and scientific plants like rice, has greatly expanded the potential for genetic research.


Plants differ from animals in several intriguing ways, making the study of plant genetics particularly fascinating. For instance, similar to mitochondria, chloroplasts in plants have their own DNA. Like animals, plants can experience somatic mutations, but these mutations can easily contribute to the germline since flowers form at the tips of branches made of somatic cells. This phenomenon, known for centuries, leads to sports, or mutant branches, which can produce economically valuable fruit, resulting in new cultivars.


Certain plant species are capable of self-fertilization, and some are almost exclusively self-fertilising, meaning a single plant can act as both parents to its offspring—an uncommon occurrence in animals. To create crossbreeds between different plants, scientists must take special precautions to prevent self-fertilization.


Plants also have a unique ability to thrive as polyploids, possessing extra sets of chromosomes—a condition that is often incompatible with animal life. Polyploid plants, produced through various processes, are typically unable to breed back with the parent type. If capable of self-fertilisation, polyploids can establish a new, genetically distinct lineage, leading to the formation of a new species, a phenomenon often referred to as 'instant speciation'. Polyploids tend to produce larger fruits, a desirable trait in agriculture, and many staple crops such as wheat, maize, strawberries, and tobacco are either accidentally or deliberately created as polyploids.


Creating hybrids between plant species is relatively simple through hand-pollination, and they tend to be more successful than animal hybrids. To develop a single individual with desirable traits, tens of thousands of offspring from a single cross may be raised and tested. People often create plant hybrids for both economic and aesthetic reasons, particularly in the case of orchids.

DNA

Deoxyribonucleic acid (DNA) is a nucleic acid that carries the genetic instructions essential for the growth, development, and functioning of all living organisms and some viruses. Its primary function is to store genetic information long-term. Often likened to blueprints, a recipe, or a code, DNA contains the instructions for building cellular components such as proteins and RNA. The specific DNA sequences that carry this genetic information are called genes, while other sequences serve structural purposes or regulate how genetic information is used. In plant genetics, scientists harness DNA sequencing to modify genetic traits by splicing or deleting specific genes or regions of the DNA molecule. This allows them to create new genotypes, ultimately producing desired phenotypes.


Gregor Mendel, an Augustinian priest and scientist, is regarded as the father of genetics. His pioneering work on trait inheritance in pea plants (Pisum) revealed that traits follow specific patterns, later termed "Mendelian laws." Although his work went largely unnoticed until the early 20th century, its rediscovery laid the foundation for modern genetics. Mendel's findings enable geneticists today to predict the outcomes of genetic crosses and their effects on phenotypes. Born on July 20, 1822, Mendel passed away on January 6, 1884, from chronic nephritis.

Genetically modifying crops

Genetically modifying crops involves several methods to introduce new DNA into a plant's genome. One approach is to cut up two separate DNA sequences, which are then placed in the same container. The sticky ends of the DNA fragments allow them to fuse into a ring with additional genetic material. Enzymes are added to solidify the new bonds, and the resulting molecules are separated by molecular weight. The heaviest molecules, which have successfully incorporated the new DNA, are preserved for further use.


A second method, known as the vector method, is similar to the plasmid approach but involves inserting the DNA directly into the genome using a viral vector. The initial steps are nearly identical: both the viral DNA and the DNA to be inserted are cut with the same enzyme, allowing them to combine. However, before the viral DNA can be used, its virulence genes must be removed to prevent the organism from becoming ill. This also creates more space to insert additional genes, making it advantageous for larger genetic modifications.


The biolistic method, or gene-gun technique, is frequently used in plant engineering, such as when adding pesticide resistance to crops. In this process, metal pellets (typically tungsten) coated with the desired DNA are fired at plant cells. Cells that successfully take up the DNA, confirmed with a marker gene, are then allowed to grow into new plants or cloned to produce genetically identical crops. While less precise than other methods, the gene-gun approach has proven highly effective for modifying plants.


Advantages of Genetically Modifying Crops

Genetically engineered crops have offered significant benefits, particularly by helping farmers combat pest issues that would otherwise reduce crop yields. Pest-resistant crops have led to higher agricultural productivity, allowing farmers to use fewer pesticides, thereby reducing chemical runoff into the soil. One example is the "Roundup Ready Corn," a patented transgenic maize variety. This crop is resistant to herbicides, enabling farmers to control weeds without harming the corn, leading to weed-free fields and increased crop production globally, especially in the U.S.


Genetically engineered crops also protect against viruses and bacteria that can devastate harvests. For instance, scientists identified a virus-resistant maize strain in Mexico and integrated its resistance genes into commercial corn strains. This allowed the newly modified corn to produce virus-resistant progeny, safeguarding crops from potential destruction.


Disadvantages of Genetically Modifying Crops

However, genetic engineering also presents challenges. According to Vaughan A. Hilder and Donald Boulter from the University of Durham, resistance failures have been observed in crops like Bt cotton, where targeted pests developed immunity. Many plant-derived resistance factors only produce chronic, rather than acute, effects, and some pests are not susceptible to current resistance strategies. Additionally, John E. Berringer points out that the long-term environmental impact of releasing genetically modified organisms (GMOs) is still uncertain.


Genetically Modified Foods and the Role of Genetic Engineering

As technology advances, genetic modification offers opportunities in agriculture and human health. By selecting genetically superior plants, crop yields have improved, storability has increased, and disease resistance has been enhanced. While transferring genes between organisms is generally harmless with proper precautions, it remains a controversial topic. Critics argue that modifying genes is unnatural and poses risks to various species, while others see it as a necessary step toward future advancements.


Genetically modified foods can offer better resistance to pests, diseases, and weeds, while improving crop yield and making more efficient use of land. Genetic alterations can also enhance food texture, flavor, and nutritional value, resulting in longer shelf life and reduced need for chemicals. According to a 2001 report by the Nutrition Action Health Letter, most of the genes in genetically engineered crops, such as corn, are no longer present by the time they are processed into products like corn oil, alleviating concerns about consuming modified DNA.


Biotechnology is also poised to address future challenges, such as reducing allergens, developing more nutritious foods, and increasing food production to meet the demands of a growing population. Ethically, some argue against genetically modifying food, viewing it as unnecessary or fearing that excessive technological advancements in agriculture could have negative consequences. However, the trend indicates that genetically modified foods will continue to emerge, bringing a wider range of benefits.


Ethical Considerations and Risks

While genetic engineering offers promising advantages, it also raises ethical, environmental, and safety concerns. For instance, genetically engineered bacteria accidentally released into the environment have killed beneficial soil fungi and become toxic to plants. These unforeseen consequences highlight the risks of tampering with DNA. Genetic modifications could lead to issues such as antibiotic-resistant bacteria or the introduction of harmful genes into the food chain. Research has linked genetic engineering to health risks, including cancer, heart disease, and ulcers in animals.


The regulation of genetic research, particularly in the U.S., has been inconsistent, with key bioethics commissions having been defunded or allowed to expire. This lack of oversight raises concerns about the long-term safety and ethical implications of genetic engineering. Critics argue that scientists and media outlets often downplay the potential dangers of genetic modification, leading to calls for stricter regulation and public transparency.


For many, genetic engineering is also a moral issue. Some view it as "playing God" and are opposed to the idea of manipulating the genetic makeup of living beings. There are concerns that genetic uniformity, resulting from widespread gene editing, could increase vulnerability to disease. With reduced genetic diversity, a single disease outbreak could affect large populations with similar genetic makeups, as their immune systems would lack the necessary variety to resist new threats.


Given the complexity of DNA, fully understanding and mapping every aspect of the genetic code may not be realistic, and gaps in our knowledge could lead to mistakes in genetic engineering practices. As Dr. Elena Gates of the University of California at San Francisco warns, the unchecked progress of genetic engineering could have unintended and far-reaching consequences, including the potential for significant harm to future generations.


In conclusion, while genetic engineering holds enormous potential, it must be approached with caution, transparency, and ethical responsibility. Public trust can be maintained through accurate labeling, informed decision-making, and the careful regulation of genetic research. Only by weighing both the benefits and the risks can society fully understand the impact of genetic modification on food, health, and the environment.

Summary of Morphology


Back to top